Kashmir Watch, Nov 26
By Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal
[Specialist on State Terrorism]
[The US-led international state terrorist (IST) rogues are dismantling the Islamic world according to a plan. Can the shamelessly disunited Islamic world be saved and protected from the Western and Israeli-Indo hidden terror and energy agendas? The way the puppet regimes in Islamabad, Kabul and Baghdad behave, rather misbehave against Islam and Muslims, it looks the entire Islamic world would be brought under occupation by the nasty anti-Islamic world led by terror states like USA, UK, France, India and Israel. Bulk of Arab leaders is still at the feet of the Western capitalists and their leaders refuse to spot light in true Islam. Pakistan is supposedly a part of Islamic world and the only Muslim nuclear power in the world and therefore is also been occupied by the western democratic terror states with official Pakistani and usual Indian support. Worse the media in these countries are controlled by anti-Islamic hawks and state war lords. Global state terrorists GST have been destroying Pakistan and other Muslim nations, killing over a million innocent Muslims in the region thus far. US led terror fire has destroyed many zones of Pakistan and the people therein].
PART- ONE
Islamic world is in turmoil and Arab world remains in a state of constantly serious threat from the western energy hungry Axis evils. Resources of Iraq and Afghanistan are being squandered by the western nuclear terrorists in democracy suits. Pakistan has been burning for quite some it me now along with Afghanistan, but its leaders don’t see any threat to their seats. Yet, no one in Pakistan, for instance, seems to be really worried about saving Pakistan from Western and nearby Pro-US invaders: the ordinary people have their own bread and butter problems; the media people have their own masters’ agendas, the ruling dispensation has its own agenda, while the occupiers have their own agenda and nukes are almost ready to reach the Western terror hands. Thus each section moves according to their own pet agendas, while Pakistanis are being terrorized and killed in a phased manner and Pakistan is being destroyed step by step. When none in Pakistan seems to be interested in an Islamic state, there is absolutely nothing for anyone else to do anything about.
The same is true of other occupied nations like Afghanistan and Iraq. However, it is indeed a valid question and only the US president Obama can answer as it all depends on what US-led NATO and its other terror allies including Pakistan and India would do next. A destabilized Pakistan is finding it difficult to shield itself from the foreign invaders who continue to occupy it on some fictitious pretexts. In the absence any sincere move from Pakistanis and their elected regime, especially from the court servants who spearheaded the “democracy” fight to instate the Zardari regime, there is clearly no chance that Pakistanis would get back their lost sovereignty to the global state terrorists.
A regime that works against the interests of the people and invites foreign terrorists in democratic suits to kill its own people is rogue state. The miseries afflicting the masses in their daily lives are of no consequences for the ruling dispensation of Pakistan. Politicians who are focused only on their own welfare and show utter disregard to the people’s aspirations see no reason to support ordinary citizens of the country now when the foreign democratic terrorists are killing defenseless Muslims as terrorists. Pakistan’s political scene is flooded with political actors including novices harboring misplaced delusions of mass leadership and the politicos who have no other outstanding credentials except dynasty.
Unfortunately, Muslim rulers, including Arab leaders, behave hypocrites and are largely extremely corrupt people whom people don’t trust. Pakistani politics revolves around dynasties and big capitalists. The fact remains that Nawaz Sharif owes his rise to power to his mentor late General Zia Ul Haq whereas late Benazir Bhutto and now Asif Ali Zardari is capitalizing on the PPP, a political party formed by late Z A Bhutto and his comrades in late 1960s. However, they have yet to understand the basic principle of politics that a leadership’s sustenance comes from people’s power. And the people would only support it when it stays relevant to their lives. For decades, Pakistan unfortunately has not been able to produce selfless and caring leadership notwithstanding all crises capable of generating fresh crop of such great individual leaders. USA has never let that happen in Pakistan considered by the west as the puppet regime under USA control. Even today, none from either ruling or opposition streams question the occupation of Islamabad by the NATO rogues, let alone asking them to quit. But it seems the rulers show the spirit of tolerance, which is considered a hallmark of democracy to let the foreign forces drone-kill Pakistanis, while being intolerance to Muslims seeking Islamization of Islamabad.
In one way, both USA and Pakistan have a common strait, they have ditched their people on falsified terror. A state without any sincere concerns of people at heart is as good as dead. Pakistani leadership does not show it is entirely different. Pakistani leadership always committed to their own people and capitalists and care only about US interests in the country, although Pakistan is not a part of US Empire. US promotes corrupt regimes and the self interest across the globe help the capitalists in Pakistan and elsewhere, while Pakistan exists now only for its own billionaires, for Pakistani capitalism and profiteering. Thus there is a natural coincidence of Pak-US interests. But beyond that USA also has energy and anti-Islamic interests and Pakistani regime supports that for service charges. This is the basis genesis of the ongoing terror war in Pakistan.
PART-TWO
The horrid neo-conservatives under Bush believed that the world was ripe for a huge expansion of American power and influence. The CIA and Pentagon networks charted plans of subduing the world by employing concepts like democracy, regime change, WMD, axis of evil, etc. This in turn resulted in the US led forces occupying the countries like Afghanistan and Iraq, but now unable either to quit or to annex them as many other countries have done in similar situations. Genocides by these western democracies seem unstoppable with more and more Muslims falling to their terror methods.
Islamic world requires an effective shield form anti-Islamic invasions, but the Muslim nations do not consider protection of Islam and Islamic world more important than making more profits in illegal and immoral businesses. Added to this, bulk of media of Islamic world, especially of Arab nations, above all the ones in English language, are being controlled by Chrestian-Jewish-Hindu journalists whose anti-Islamic mindset is beyond doubt. They tarnish the image of Islam and Islamic nations, Muslims in sustained manner. The result is, even Muslims are coerced to recognise Islam as a terrorists’ religion. The larger issue is the protection of Islamic world from the anti-Islamic state terrorists of the West and East. The deadly neoconservative strategy of “remaking” the Mideast region to secure its cheap (free) and unlimited energy supply single-handedly with the support of fascist Israel, of course has been undermined by its own hubris and continued occupation strategies. Democracy having being failed in the region, with over 100 deaths every day in Islamic world, Pakistan inclusive, on an average, the establishment of a New Middle East has become a joke. In short, it proposes a reversal of the key strands of Bush's aggressive foreign policy. Though the US people have delivered a resounding rebuff to the Bush foreign policy and clearly rejected the US-led wars in Middle East, Bush did take revenge on the former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein with his martyrdom and made the position of the USA easier in West Asia for energy resources. USA on account of the” terror wars” has in fact sacrificed its global leadership on security and human rights guard.
The energy rich Middle East controlled by the Arab capitalists on Western ideas historically looks to the USA as their defender and close ally .The USA has been the decisive arbiter in the Middle East since the end of the Suez crisis in 1956, albeit with the Soviet Union playing a secondary role until 1989. Not even the closest ally, Saudi Arabia seems to trust the real intentions of the US invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. The regional consequences of the Iraq imbroglio are immediate, profound and far-reaching. As one of the most dangerous spot in the world, Iraq has emerged as a problem from the bush ministration. The civil war threatens to unhinge more or less the entire Middle East and Pentagon-CIA-Mossad Axis evils are working overnight to provoke them. Notwithstanding the confusion that engulfed the Western powers now, the Pentagon and the US administration are seemingly at work to eradicate the harm done to the American prestige.
The USA over centuries has fought fiercely many whirlwinds to establish its supremacy, in economic as well as military terms, with the USSR providing the most formidable challenge for US till 1991. As Cold War crippled the economy of the USSR leading to a state of economic stagnation and growing political paralysis by the 1980s leading to its eventual fate in 1992, leaving the USA as the sole superpower and the victorious US began concentrating on other “axis of evils”. The collapse of the socialist system in the Eastern Europe greatly encouraged the neo-conservatives in Washington to utterly misread the historical runes at the end of the 1990s, when the USA became unchallenged power militarily, economically and technologically. Now USA is on a terror war to control the Islamic world and the resources there.
The fight with USSR also gave the USA opportunity to forge strong bond with the Western powers and the Middle Eastern nations. The aggressive policy of the USA in West Asia seems to have created embarrassment for the US-Muslim world relations. Before the entire world, the neo-conservative position is disintegrating. Its foreign policy tenets have been proven to be false. As is now openly admitted, including by the new Defense Secretary Robert Gates, US wars in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan have failed. The failed anti-Islamic terror wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have once again reminded the Americans also of the past experience and forecast the possible disastrous fall out of its West Asian misadventure.
The USA wanted- still wants- to show its power to those that oppose it or , worse, challenges American hegemony, but rout in Vietnam shaped the foreign policy of the Washington until the Sept 11, when the desire to avoid overseas military entanglements was overwhelmed by the desire to demonstrate its power world over. Although one of the key justifications for the Vietnam War was to prevent the spread of communism, the U.S. defeat was to produce nothing of the kind. While the American defeat in Vietnam did not signal any serious upturn in the fortunes of its arch enemy, the Soviet Union, though the communist movement got a shot in arm because of the rout of “US imperialism”, the US occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan threatens with worst possible consequences for those courtiers as well as the occupation forces led by the USA.
Misguided by the notorious Neocons and by misreading global trends, the Bush administration's embrace of unilateralism not only provoked the Iraq-Afghanistan disaster but also hastened American decline. The policy failure in Middle could also signal decline the case globally as well. When the most powerful and, indeed, the most influential USA could also get things profoundly wrong, the position cannot be different with other strong powers of the globe. By displaying arrogance through their external pursuits in many parts of the world, President Bush and advisors have brought the USA to the brim of disorder. The war on terror has tarnished the image of the world’s only super power. Cruel killing of Saddam did cause a slur on the psyche of the US diplomacy once hailed as great when the former President withdrew the US forces from Vietnam. By relegating diplomatic efforts to sidelines, not only Bush became one of the most wanted criminals on the earth today shielded by the Obama administration, but also the USA itself feels let down by its responsible leaders and looks to Obama for sincere actions to punish the Americans for their genocides in USA (Sept11) and Islamic world.
PART-THREE
USA used Osamaphobia to achieve the Neocon agenda of controlling the energy resources and routes. Now “democratic” USA needs cash from China and Japan, while India has already offered sumptuous money to Americans. Even as the Muslim nations refuse to take a joint action against Islamophobia and anti-Islamic terrorism, America has indeed become a troubled nation now and none trusts it. With the “terror war” damaging the US image as well as foundations of the diplomacy plank of USA, the EU is emerging as an economically as well as influentially strong block of nations,. Economic slide downward along with the US dollar falling steadily against the euro, the pound and the yen is certainly not to the advantage of the USA. Devastating genocide and destruction in Afghanistan and Iraq have also created jerks in US-EU relations, on the one hand, and US-Arab ties, on the other, and in some measure misunderstanding with the UK that seem to take its own decisions about troop withdrawal. USA remains the most influential power of the world with most countries, big as well as small, vying with one another to engage the USA in strategic relations.
Thanks to neocons unilateralism, loss of US prestige as a super power and image of being an anti-democratic regime stare at the legacy of Bush administration daringly, while President Obama is still “healthless” to end the anti-Islamic terror wars. Sharing energy resources in Central Asia cannot be replicated in this explosive Mideast region any more. Such a scenario may well mean that the key alliance that has shaped the Middle East since 1956 — between the U.S. and Israel — will no longer be so pivotal and could even be increasingly downgraded. That means, USA and UK should share their "global responsibilities" with these countries and construct a credible multipolar world.
The American era looks now over. The bull talk of democracy and rule of law has been a fraud played on poor nations and Arab world. An increasingly multipolar world requires an entirely different kind of U.S. foreign policy: far from being unilateralist, it necessitates a complex form of power sharing on both a global and regional basis. The new approach is implicit in the ISG report, which recognizes that any resolution of the Iraq crisis depends on the involvement of Iran and Syria. The US Secretary of State, Rice might have rejected that idea now. But elements of this approach are already apparent on the Korean peninsula and in Latin America.
Bush Jr. is condemned as one of the worst Presidents ever. After the discredited war with Philippine long ago and the Vietnam war reversals in 1970s when the US forces had to flee disgracefully on both occasions, USA had resolved that it would not stretch itself too far and wide beyond its capacity and, by and large, disengaged itself from the world affairs for quite some time, until the collapse of the USSR. End of Cold war rekindled the US desire to showcase its military superiority in action. USA has been rendered its allies directionless and clueless and they have no idea about their real mission. World criticism in combination of the situation in occupied Afghanistan and Iraq dictates that in future the U.S. will have to shelve unilateralism and share its influence with regional powers such as Iran, Syria as well as powers like Russia, China and the EU in due course. Both Russia and China stipulate that US must act according to the UN rules.
Fascist Israel has to relinquish air and sea controls on Gaza strip of Palestine. Obama administration’s efforts should be to make that happen soon. Obama has not been elected to pursue the death policies of Bush and other rogues of White House. Though discredited for now, US remains the most influential power of the world with most countries, big as well as small, vying with one another to engage the USA in strategic relations. Its challenge today particularly in post-Saddam West Asia is however too great to be assessed easily, but in any case it would have to make necessary amendments to revive its lost glory. Force additions may not change the fortunes of USA. The U.S. might enjoy overwhelming military advantage, but its relative economic power, which in the long run is almost invariably decisive, is now in decline, too. Instead of wars and sanctions, revival of enough diplomatic skills could bring some good message for the Obama administration.
President Obama has rightly asked Burma to free Burmese pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, but he should also extent the logic to Afghans, Pakistanis and Iraqis as well. In fact he must call for freeing all Muslims from terrorism strategies. Now that the US led NATO has successfully spread their poisonous tentacles across the destabilized region with puppet regimes established by the Pentagon-CIA-Mossad to suit their terror cum resources agendas, Pakistan could be saved only if President Obama takes a firm decision to drive away the US-NATO terror forces form Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. The entire region has to be saved almost simultaneously and that can happen only when the USA honestly decides to quit the Islamic world and punish the western criminals for genocides in Islamic world as well as for the ghastly Sept-11 event meticulously engineered to enable the US state terrorists to invade Afghanistan and kill Muslims and squander their resources, besides keeping the citizens there as US captives.
In pursuing the double-standards of America and European powers, President Obama seems to be either under some illusions about Israel and India or terribly confused about his course of action in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan against the wish of Neocon rogues and Bushdom Axis evils. He has to regain the trust of Islamic world. Just by rhetoric alone Obama cannot bridge the gap with Islamic world, nor by more state terrorisms. Threat perceptions generated by the CIA-Pentagon network kept the ties fairly on with Europe, Russia and Muslim world. The challenge of Obama administration today is to tide over the situation in order to both “contain" the Republicans, former Neocons who are still active in White House and enhance US global prestige has to be watched. US double speak in disarmament has generated enough suspicion in the world, but Washington under Obama label goes ahead with its objective of strengthening its world hold.
Tell me, can Islamic world be saved and shielded from all sorts of anti-Islamic sources- both within and from outside?
Related Links
*A Free Kashmir: Random Thoughts
Part 1-71 [Mar 2008 to Mar 2009]
*Interview: "I Defend Muslims" Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal ,
27 Dec 2008 3
Posted on 26 Nov 2009 by
Webmaster
